From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 13 3:12:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5309E37B401 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 03:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.dada.it (mail2.dada.it [195.110.100.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B05C43E3B for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 03:12:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from riccardo@torrini.org) Received: (qmail 27498 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 10:05:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO torrini.org) (195.110.114.101) by mail.dada.it with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 10:05:40 -0000 Received: from trudy.torrini.home (localhost.torrini.home [127.0.0.1]) by torrini.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7DA5gj1064700 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:05:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from riccardo@trudy.torrini.home) Received: (from riccardo@localhost) by trudy.torrini.home (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7D9Q0qd064600 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:26:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Riccardo Torrini To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM-ATAPI status? Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 13-Aug-2002 (00:27:51/GMT) Nate Lawson wrote: > You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c: WOW ! > Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos > Add the ability to use ATAPI devices via CAM. I'm back from holidays and I'm still reading over 1200 old messages of -CURRENT (last 3 weeks). My -CURRENT is not so current :\, I have a pre gcc_3.1, is now safe to rebuild or I'd read _all_ old mail before? > See /sys/conf/NOTES for usage. I think this is a 'stupid' question, but before this message I looked only into /sys/i386/conf/NOTES for configurations, why the one in /sys/conf/ is different and why they are two? If /sys/alpha/conf/NOTES and /sys/i386/conf/NOTES are only {alpha,i386} specific, why some part are duplicated? I am confused :\ Riccardo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message