Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:36:45 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald <gcoon@inch.com> Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Dell 2650 notes from the field? Message-ID: <20040526183645.GA763@arthur.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20040526131846.T73581@kod.inch.com> References: <20040526131846.T73581@kod.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.05.26 13:39:21 -0400, Gerald wrote: > I'm setting up FreeBSD on a few dual Xeon Dell 2650s to be deployed soon. > I can make do with a single proc until FreeBSD has more mature SMP > ability. I'm actually going to roll it out as a 4.8 box and upgrade to 4.9 I have been using FreeBSD SMP for several years and it has been working just fine. > Does anyone have any pointers about FreeBSD + or - SMP on these > Poweredge 2650's under a decent load? I saw one post where someone Why don't you just test them and simulate some heavy load? I have used a few of those for the last couple of months and they have worked without any problems, but they have been under "light-medium" load. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAtOO9h9pcDSc1mlERAtRdAJ9lSTVg44dBlHMQBlq0aZR9sQ9saQCcCLMV 5fKJf/qZGdqf/UtkrY58jx0= =jnLG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040526183645.GA763>