From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Mar 2 08:17:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E46BF2E819; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31FB73A7D; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id CA3437EEF; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:17:45 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: yuri@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, python , "Tobias C. Berner" Subject: Re: svn commit: r463374 - head/security/nyx Message-ID: <20180302081745.GA13658@FreeBSD.org> References: <201803020651.w226ptn3091275@repo.freebsd.org> <6f698e1f-a5d5-2cd7-b2b7-c288a3c65bb6@FreeBSD.org> <6dd4b973-fbcb-8fa8-fb3e-1cece416898f@freebsd.org> <531069af-c0fc-1b2c-0c91-52cd73ba001e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <531069af-c0fc-1b2c-0c91-52cd73ba001e@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:17:46 -0000 On 3/2/18 6:40 PM, Yuri wrote: > If the port can only be used as an app, as opposed to library, multiple > flavors aren't needed. All users care about is an executable. It doesn't > matter what python version is used. That's what sane^Wyou and I would think. :-) On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 06:57:51PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > 2) The 'app vs library' distinction is not sound here. It wasn't sound > for python package prefixing in the past either. It was always sound and meaningful, but FreeBSD Python cabal had decided otherwise (and adopted that stupid "prefix everything with py-" rule which is counterintuitive and makes looking for programs harder). But oh well, we've argued over this years ago Kubilay. ./danfe