From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Oct 27 12:22:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.noos.fr (aragon.noos.net [212.198.2.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F4F37B401 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 12:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 44290519 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2001 19:22:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.229.145]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.75 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Oct 2001 19:22:17 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9RJMG268853; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Message-Id: <200110271922.f9RJMG268853@gits.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: What are the best diff options ? In-Reply-To: <20011027104214.A7633@rhadamanth> To: setantae Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: clefevre@citeweb.net From: Cyrille Lefevre Organization: ACME X-Face: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94c (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org setantae wrote: > > I'm going to spend this morning cleaning up a few manpages, etc. > > http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/submitting.html indicates that the best options > to diff would just be a simple -c. -u is far more better than -c. > However, this produces output that doesn't clearly show what has changed and > looks nothing like most of the other diffs I have seen. > > Should I be using this option, or does it not really matter ? > > I'm probably only going to be patching one file at a time. here is the content of alias I use : diff -ruN -x CVS -x work -x "#*" -x "*~" -x "*.orig" -x "*.rej" \ -I "\$Id.*\$" -I "\$FreeBSD.*\$" Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message