From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 17:35:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBFB16A50A for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomstroubleshooting.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750D743D5C for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:35:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@tomstroubleshooting.com) Received: from zeus ([68.235.136.100]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060513173527.NOPU14145.mta10.adelphia.net@zeus> for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 13:35:27 -0400 From: "Tom Moore" To: Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:35:22 -0400 Message-ID: <000301c676b3$9f398b90$6603a8c0@zeus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcZ2s5IyIyobF6pOSFWyK8AwGmwBCQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Relayed-By: GPGrelay Version 0.959 (Win32) Subject: Cvsup verses Portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:35:52 -0000 Hi guys. Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to date? What are some pros and cons of each approach? Is one method better than the other? Tom -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/338 - Release Date: 5/12/2006