From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Dec 31 19:37:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4D4A573AC; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org (repo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9996A1C0E; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.37]) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBVJbE2u022790; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:14 GMT (envelope-from dteske@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from dteske@localhost) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tBVJbEHC022789; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:14 GMT (envelope-from dteske@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201512311937.tBVJbEHC022789@repo.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repo.freebsd.org: dteske set sender to dteske@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Devin Teske Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:14 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r293000 - head/sys/boot/forth X-SVN-Group: head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:15 -0000 Author: dteske Date: Thu Dec 31 19:37:14 2015 New Revision: 293000 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293000 Log: Remove supposition comment that code would better live elsewhere. Thinking this through, and looking at process_assignment, I believe moving the code would be wrong considering that set_conf_files is called in one condition while set_nextboot_conf is guarded by a different condition of having nextboot_enable="YES". So these must stay separated and not combined. MFC after: 1 week Modified: head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th Modified: head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th ============================================================================== --- head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th Thu Dec 31 19:33:17 2015 (r292999) +++ head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th Thu Dec 31 19:37:14 2015 (r293000) @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ only forth also support-functions also f s" loader_conf_files" getenv conf_files string= ; -: set_nextboot_conf \ XXX maybe do as set_conf_files ? +: set_nextboot_conf value_buffer strget unquote nextboot_conf_file string= ;