Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:50:12 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/162991: java/openjdk6 fails to build Message-ID: <201203121250.14548.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5E15A2.204@gmail.com> References: <201203080750.q287oEA5033004@freefall.freebsd.org> <201203081309.55633.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4F5E15A2.204@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 12 March 2012 11:26 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Thursday 08 March 2012 02:50 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > >> Ok, I found time to investigate it. > >> > >> Everything is about arch guessing. java/openjdk7 substitutes > >> amd64 for x86_64 while java/openjdk6 doesn't. I just added > >> missing bits from correspondent java/openjdk7 patch. > >> > >> Redports build: > >> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20120307160255-45601 > >> > >> Patch attached. > > > > Sorry but it doesn't make any sense. I guess you are patching > > this: > > > > ... > > # Platform settings specific to BSD > > ifeq ($(PLATFORM), bsd) > > OS_VERSION := $(shell uname -r) > > # Arch and OS name/version > > mach := $(shell uname -m) > > archExpr = case "$(mach)" in \ > > i[3-9]86) \ > > echo i586 \ > > ;; \ > > *) \ > > echo $(mach) \ > > ;; \ > > esac > > ARCH := $(shell $(archExpr) ) > > ARCH_FAMILY := $(ARCH) > > ... > > > > Unless "UNAME_m" environment variable is set, there is no way > > that this patch does anything at all. > > > > % uname -r > > 10.0-CURRENT > > % uname -m > > amd64 > > % env UNAME_m=x86_64 uname -m > > x86_64 > > > > I believe OpenJDK7 added it because some BSDs (e.g., > > DragonFlyBSD) return x86_64 for "uname -m". > > So why it ends up in our port and not in DragonFlyBSD's pkgsrc? OpenJDK7 patchset is shared with other BSDs: https://wikis.oracle.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort OpenJDK6 patchset was based on early OpenJDK7 patchsets and it may or may not build on other platforms. I am 99% sure it won't build on DragonFlyBSD/x86-64, BTW. > > BTW, does "make DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes" make any difference? > > Actually after successful build I can't reproduce this issue > anymore. I seem to miss some bits of data so I'll try to retest in > clean environment. These parallel build problems are very hard to reproduce. Actually, I was never able to reproduce it myself. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201203121250.14548.jkim>