Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:48:03 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INTR_POLARITY_BOTH_EDGES? Message-ID: <7c16a5a7-ab5a-6aa7-df15-171ea5308d2d@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <aee40a9e-729a-6e87-4f7c-f96533681c51@FreeBSD.org> References: <aee40a9e-729a-6e87-4f7c-f96533681c51@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/30/20 1:22 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > What do you think about adding this to intr_polarity ? > I think that it's useful for two reasons: > - support for GPIO interrupts of that kind (GPIO_INTR_EDGE_BOTH) > - symmetry with ACPI's ACPI_ACTIVE_BOTH (which probably exists for GPIO as well) > This new polarity is to be valid only with INTR_TRIGGER_EDGE as the name (and > sanity) implies. > > By the way, the name is a open for bikeshedding. Sounds ok to me. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7c16a5a7-ab5a-6aa7-df15-171ea5308d2d>