From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jun 21 15:32:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C55C37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:32:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7) id 15DCzk-0004dw-00 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:32:12 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f5LMWBm37903 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:32:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:32:10 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: most complex code in BSD? Message-ID: <20010621233210.A37804@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In everyone's opinion, what is the most complex code in the BSD codebase? Not including asm (unless there is an especialy exemplary example of obfuscated code, but it seems compilers are better at that ;-) what code is most likely to turn a newbie's brain to tapioca? Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message