From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 21 8: 4:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1A437B400 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g0LG4gF19508; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:04:42 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0LG2Ft42553; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:02:16 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200201211602.g0LG2Ft42553@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review References: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" "Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:42:44 +0300." Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:02:15 +0000 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do > > One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP > responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or > wrong automated scripts processing. > > I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to > control that per admin choice. Yes. That would be a good move. :-) M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message