From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 11:19:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE44106568E for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6F78FC33 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m88BJB6s027707; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:19:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m88BJBw2027704; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:19:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:19:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: David Southwell In-Reply-To: <200809080436.41021.david@vizion2000.net> Message-ID: <20080908131544.V27701@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200809080436.41021.david@vizion2000.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:19:24 -0000 > > I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including most european > ones) now have the right to access all emails that pass through an ISP's only if you use big operators. > BIG BROTHER is watching far too much. Frankly I am surprised that we have democracy. in democracy majority decides for everybody. majority wanted it for "they own good". minority has to shut up or go away. > Another emerging issue is cable operators refusing to allow fixed IP address > so they can receive revenue from reporting on user usage data. could you please tell more about the sentence above. maybe it's my bad english but i don't understand. why constantly changing user IP could help reporting user data and getting revenue? > This movement to commercialise the internet and limit access in this way is > deplorable when there are alternative methods of dealing with legitimate even now we are more restricted than people in China, where they have "chinese internet" with very very limited access to outside, but withing chinese internet there are very little limits.