From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 17:36:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BCA16A421 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DAB43D4C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9HHZEXj011188; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:35:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:36:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20051017.113630.35505791.imp@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd@psam.se From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <4352E841.6000601@psam.se> References: <4350C749.9070704@psam.se> <20051015.125419.47698820.imp@bsdimp.com> <4352E841.6000601@psam.se> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:35:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoshiba Tecra 8000 with 3com 3CXFE575CT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:36:31 -0000 OK. Next step is a question. I can't tell from your dmesg for sure, but it looks like you have the xl0 card inserted on boot. Is that correct? If so, I'd like to suggest an experiment. Insert the card after the login: prompt has appeared. Does it detect and configure? If not, then we have a global routing problem. If so, then we have an interrupt issue with the TOPIC 95B chip that you have of some sort that we need to address. It looks like my Topic 97 part works great, but I'll double check again with -current and 6.0. Warner