From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 22:32:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375951065673 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50918FC16 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MAtaC-0003Xq-DY for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:48 +0000 Received: from 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz ([90.178.41.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:48 +0000 Received: from gamato by 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:48 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:32:37 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <20090208073927.77e2c829@bhuda.mired.org> <200902081252.n18CqhZf016155@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081125 SeaMonkey/1.1.13 In-Reply-To: <200902081252.n18CqhZf016155@lurza.secnetix.de> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: Graphics support for /boot/loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 22:32:52 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Mike Meyer wrote: > > I'm curious - is there a reason that the numbers from the old screen > > have turned into function keys on this one? > > No. That screen shot is an old one. In the current code, > the number keys are used as usual, no function keys. > > In fact, it is not possible to use function keys from the > FORTH code without resorting to dirty hacks. That's what I was thinking about -- whether one could use plain number keys along with function keys and also wanted to ask you to align them with the original text boot menu -- I'm too used to #4 being single user mode. ;-) Cheers and thanks for great work! Martin