From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jan 5 11:52:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703CE37B401; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:52:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3AB43EC2; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 11:52:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21526; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:52:42 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030105125030.02936e30@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:52:37 -0700 To: Rahul Siddharthan From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Cc: Terry Lambert , "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20030105192556.GA526@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0@localhost> <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030105074923.GA4956@papagena.rockefeller.edu> <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030105120224.029377d0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:25 PM 1/5/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >You did say you were interested in heavily nested loops and floating >point arithmetic. Sparse matrix operations qualify. But using whose algorithms and libraries? We didn't test sparse matrix algorithms because that's not what our code was designed to do. >It is interesting, in fact, that gcc does well in all such problems. Again, using whose code? We consistently found that on ours, Intel was better. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message