From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org  Wed May 20 14:59:07 2020
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E618F2DBD65;
 Wed, 20 May 2020 14:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49RwrC5kYjz4JxM;
 Wed, 20 May 2020 14:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from beaver (unknown [81.6.39.88])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ehaupt)
 by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7AED36763;
 Wed, 20 May 2020 14:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:59:05 +0200
From: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc: Hiroki Tagato <tagattie@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, koobs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r535526 - in head: . sysutils
 sysutils/py-rdiff-backup sysutils/py-rdiff-backup/files
 sysutils/rdiff-backup
Message-Id: <20200520165905.114abeca25f06c90b71f3945@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200520143655.rvvwajvklbkzyvdz@aching.in.mat.cc>
References: <202005170835.04H8ZKws029186@repo.freebsd.org>
 <20200520143655.rvvwajvklbkzyvdz@aching.in.mat.cc>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:59:08 -0000

Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 08:35:20AM +0000, Hiroki Tagato wrote:
> >   - Rename portname to py-rdiff-backup following Python Ports
> > Policy[1]
> 
> This feels like a very bad idea, for more than one reason.

This was reviewed in (you subscribed too):

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24816

> - This renamed the package, so once again, it left users running pkg
>   upgrade with an outdated version.  Unless they notice it and figure
>   out what the new name of the port is.
> - This looks like a end user tool, so, people will want to install
>   rdiff-backup, not pyxy-rdiff-backup.
> 
> All in all, I think the rename should be backed out.

koobs reasoning made sense to me but I don't mind renaming the port
again if there is a final consensus.