From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Thu Nov  9 17:42:20 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02163E56F0E
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  9 Nov 2017 17:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C58709B8
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Nov 2017 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id DFE92E56F0D; Thu,  9 Nov 2017 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF87EE56F0C
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Nov 2017 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6734709B5
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  9 Nov 2017 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1eCqqH-000OwD-PW; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:42:17 +0100
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:42:17 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@mailbox.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@dan.me.uk, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: mail/opendkim
Message-ID: <20171109174217.GB49221@home.opsec.eu>
References: <87tvy3sctp.wl-herbert@mailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87tvy3sctp.wl-herbert@mailbox.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:42:20 -0000

Hi!

> Bugzilla[1] lists three new and one open PR for mail/opendkim. Is the
> port still maintained?

Yes, but some of the PRs are difficult to parse.

> The port does not build with security/openssl-devel. There is a patch:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828466
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendkim/patches/37/
> https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/plain/trunk/openssl_1.1.0_compat.patch?h=packages/opendkim
> 
> The patch requires autoreconf.

I generated a patch using that patch in

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223568

> Can you/anyone commit it?

A simple build-test looks OK (but fails if LUA is enabled),
but I can't run-test it. Can you do it ?

With LUA I've seen some strange thing on a simple build-test
on a loaded box, must re-do it in poudriere.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !