From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 14 15:36:57 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA27836
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:36:57 -0800
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA27786
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:36:28 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA04216; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:37:25 -0700
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:37:25 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199511142337.QAA04216@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD mentioned in SunExpert
In-Reply-To: <199511142333.RAA29533@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
References: <199511142321.QAA04121@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<199511142333.RAA29533@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > In Jim Frost's review of WNT 3.51, FreeBSD is mentioned as one of the
> > 'modern UNIX variants' who have an integrated VM and filesystem cache.
> > We are placed in the same boat as 'SunOX, HP/UX, and SVR4.
> 
> All right!  :-)  This was pointed out to me by a coworker earlier today too.
> 
> This is a good reminder, however, that work remains to be done on the
> bleeding edge technologies such as lfs...  (read the article)

Yep.  Hopefully Justin will get some time to work on LFS now that the
Adaptec stuff seems to be winding down.


Nate