From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 15 19:55:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7A16AEE0 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail002.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail002.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691FB43D1F for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:55:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) i7FJtGG18150; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 05:55:17 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])i7FJtGxP020356; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 05:55:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)i7FJtGEu020355; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 05:55:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 05:55:16 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Julian Stacey Message-ID: <20040815195516.GL423@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200408151150.i7FBoWsP036421@flip.jhs.private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408151150.i7FBoWsP036421@flip.jhs.private> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs -R export -r RELENG_5_2 src X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 19:55:26 -0000 On Sun, 2004-Aug-15 13:50:32 +0200, Julian Stacey wrote: >/pub/FreeBSD/branches/5.0-stable does not. 5-STABLE doesn't exist yet. The upcoming 5.3-RELEASE is planned as the first 5-STABLE release. See http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html >Anyway, it seems those CVSUP users have a luxury we CTM users don't >have: they get to have a more recent kernel, why is that ? I'm not sure what you are getting at here. CVSup talks directly to a CVS repository and so you get to see commits shortly after they are made. CTM generates update batches every 8 hours and relies on CVSup to access the master repository. CVSup is always going to be more up-to-date than CTM. CVSup also allows you to pick arbitrary CVS tags, wheres CTM is limited to RELENG_3, RELENG_4 and head. If this is a problem, use CTM to replicate the repository and do your own checkout. > why can't we have a CTM 5 stable feed. Because 5-STABLE doesn't exist yet. I'm sure that once it exists, you'll be able to get a CTM feed. -- Peter Jeremy