From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 01:58:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C6416A420; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9CC43D5D; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:58:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0C1wqUU021795; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:58:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k0C1wqA1021794; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:58:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:58:52 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20060112015852.GA21690@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Scott Long , Ruslan Ermilov , amd64@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt , Peter Wemm , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20060111073859.457C37302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060111090039.N760@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <200601110853.19622.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060111150808.P760@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20060111142302.GA34661@ip.net.ua> <20060111142622.GB34661@ip.net.ua> <43C5B463.5020505@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C5B463.5020505@samsco.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:58:54 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:44:03PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >>: ---------------------------- > >>: revision 1.12 > >>: date: 1996/03/17 19:02:07; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0 > >>: Repository copy src/release/libdisk to src/lib/libdisk as per recent > >>: discussion on -core about disk partitioning tools etc. > >>: > >>: Add NOPIC=yes to Makefile to prevent any possibility of version mismatch > >>: because of the potential grave consequences. (as suggested by phk) > >>: > >>: Note that this is also on RELENG_2_1_0, since the sysinstall stuff is > >>: hopefully going to remain in sync. > > > >As a safe measure, we can build and install a special PIC archive, > >similar to libc_pic.a and libgcc_pic.a, and use it here. This is > >all in an assumption that it's still unsafe to produce the libdisk.so. > > One way or another, please fix it. Why is bsnmp linking to libdisk > anyways? It's an absolutely horrible library. That is the best question. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?