From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 08:30:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5EB16A469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chflags@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BF013C4E8 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:30:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chflags@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so909434pyb.10 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:30:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; bh=l1U2DpvBVvcI7E6Cx2OtqbwB0b8IjLksbp+/dIvZfi8=; b=RQxjlIPOBXfMNs6XYHWjASihdiJnlOxNqLaSjlzta8QDuDkijp8LJavHfH8tpwLjGAKWyZohIXwyIbbyqKb+OvrBJvCYrrJw44oL6r3DO713zGXFv3SnqQzsfZAhb/ZxqnTHjipr65uVBXMLYVX5zY1eIaecWfr175prAxv5fm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; b=edi+6R9/sE1MmqYPdMM2QPYz2klbsQ305P3UGo+d7YMlSQRMCLvwrjM0NBIlYWfhS3dmDr5e7zRI+/bchkfkWCaFQc9iCxgtQvJNGrgvCk9Fim7Yh8qNFK0MBc8cdG/DVYC+GHYKZDDaijFaVkBZ7J2KkJuRdWm88J2/5Z1poSk= Received: by 10.64.243.10 with SMTP id q10mr3732341qbh.15.1201248213914; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:03:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.137.9 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:03:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <25cb30801250003q5f484676s1851351aebc708c5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:03:33 +0800 From: "Kevin Foo" To: araujo@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: mod_security2 rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chflags@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:30:58 -0000 Hi Marcelo, I have recently csup'ed my ports tree and upgraded my box. Portupgrade completed without any problem. Later, I discovered that all my mod_security2 rules (which are the modified of default core rules) were replaced without my knowledge. Luckily, I still have decent backup of those rules. I'm not sure if it is proper for a port to upgrade config files by overwriting them even though the checksums are bad? Is this a bug? P/S : Please cc me as I'm not subscribed to ports@. -- Regards Kevin Foo