From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 28 04:07:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550416A404 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821D513C4A6 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-69-141-175.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.69.141.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4B2114307; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:59:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:07:19 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: "Freebsd Ports: Archivers" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070128033157.GB79646@atarininja.org> References: <3B27E5D772A78D81D72D9420@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <20070128014441.GA76439@atarininja.org> <20070128024514.GA79142@atarininja.org> <2A54A37FBF8B6E7EE4DEAA5F@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <20070128033157.GB79646@atarininja.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7b1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========B157CA4DB83C9519214C==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: security@silcnet.org, aquatique-ports@rambler.ru Subject: Re: Problem with devel/silc-toolkit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:07:25 -0000 --==========B157CA4DB83C9519214C========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On January 27, 2007 10:31:57 PM -0500 Wesley Shields=20 wrote: > >> I do not think this is a local problem. > > I'm now leaning towards a mirroring problem. Have you ruled this out? > Apparently someone has already fixed the problem. While I was checking=20 mirrors (some of which aren't working), the master site file was changed,=20 and the size and checksum now match. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========B157CA4DB83C9519214C==========--