From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 01:40:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB5C16A4CE; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:40:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776AF43D1D; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:40:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0D31FFDD6; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:40:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 8DBFF1FFDD4; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:40:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 81F53154D7; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775E91538C; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Mark Ogden In-Reply-To: <20040306225041.GA29333@yem.eng.utah.edu> Message-ID: References: <200403021955.i22Jtix2024059@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040303135336.GA2217@lum.celabo.org> <20040306225041.GA29333@yem.eng.utah.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-04:04.tcp X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 09:40:11 -0000 On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Mark Ogden wrote: > Jacques A. Vidrine on Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:53:36AM -0600 wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:04:05PM +0100, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > > Is there any chance to get this fixed in RELENG_5_1? > > > > I intend to do so as time allows. > > Any word on when the fix of 5.1 will be ready? by simply taking the 5.2 patch and applying it you will get two rejects which seem to be easily resolvable by hand - if the patch will dtrt is another question. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/