From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  4  8:49:43 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A84F1595A
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  4 Jun 1999 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA09490;
	Fri, 4 Jun 1999 17:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Bill Huey <billh@mag.ucsd.edu>
Cc: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 3.2-stable, panic #12
References: <199906040902.CAA14437@mag.ucsd.edu>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 04 Jun 1999 17:48:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: Bill Huey's message of "Fri, 4 Jun 1999 02:02:10 -0700 (PDT)"
Message-ID: <xzp3e08ge5c.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Bill Huey <billh@mag.ucsd.edu> writes:
> It's been rumored that CVS itself is the technical factor limiting one's
> ability to fork the tree because of the nature of how CVS update files
> by clobbering them.

That is correct. Creating branches in CVS is very expensive.

> I had a talk to someone the the #freebsd IRC channel about this. The name
> slips my mind right now.

Almost certainly EE (Eivind Eklund).

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message