From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 17:37:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E837616A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 17:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.vineyard.net (k1.vineyard.net [204.17.195.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B559F43D41 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 17:37:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joshe@jade.elsasser.org) Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vineyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AFA983DE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.vineyard.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (king1.vineyard.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75714-10 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jade.elsasser.org (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vineyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99734982C8 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by jade.elsasser.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79629F3; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 20:35:35 -0400 From: Josh Elsasser To: Toxa Message-ID: <20040525003535.GB91089@jade.elsasser.org> References: <1144707194.20040524195834@sendmail.ru> <1085416744.1327.12.camel@klotz.local> <1072928479.20040524211013@sendmail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1072928479.20040524211013@sendmail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.elsasser.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 8F39 9F2B 3738 54D9 3E40 4604 CFD5 EA3F B833 FD50 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at Vineyard.NET cc: FreeBSD Current cc: Martin Subject: Re: wi(4) and shared authmode X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 00:37:16 -0000 On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:10:13PM +0400, Toxa wrote: > Oh, yes, I have been read your discussion about it. > Well, I turn my AP back to open mode. It seems we have to wait WPA support > both in hardware and software area if we want secure wireless LANs :) You could always use IPSEC. It's a bit more work to get up and running, but you can rest easy knowing you have actual security. -jre