From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 05:58:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F9D1065675; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030FC8FC1E; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.161.100]) by nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (InterMail vM.7.05.02.08 201-2174-114-118-20080528) with ESMTP id <20100416055807.YAIJ28300.nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:07 +0000 Received: from duncan.reilly.home ([124.188.161.100]) by nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100416055807.NFZU2131.nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com@duncan.reilly.home>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:58:06 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Peter Thoenen Message-ID: <20100416055806.GA8574@duncan.reilly.home> References: <4BBB8AF2.3030102@noaa.gov> <4BBBA221.2020206@freebsd.org> <4BBBA430.2060008@noaa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BBBA430.2060008@noaa.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com from [124.188.161.100] using ID areilly@bigpond.net.au at Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:07 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150205.4BC7FC6F.00DF,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: rRkwE9P2TAD0zmQs0WyzOwJxyArnqyN48Z4QX81loRIGTUDCp8DeQ9rVMfpRsM6kxD9KJhqANGQoaazjTY3Rs9mK Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/seed X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:58:10 -0000 On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:14:24AM -1000, Peter Thoenen wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply, glad to know it's not just me. > > >Known issue. It will be fixed when GNOME 2.30 is merged into the tree. > > Might want to mark the port broke on amd64 It *is* broken, but the work-around (that I use) is fairly straightforward: just pkg_delete (or make deinstall) before attempting to build seed. What is broken is that it is finding some of the previous version's bits in the include directories, rather than the ones in the source tree. Not sure why that's such a problem for it, but doing the wrong-order incantation has allowed me to get through several iterations of port upgrades. Cheers, -- Andrew