From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 13 08:31:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA07136
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 08:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA07131
          for <hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 08:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0twtSK-0003wTC; Wed, 13 Mar 96 08:31 PST
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA22337; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 16:31:21 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org>
cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 1996 09:11:37 EDT."
             <199603131411.OAA21221@exalt.x.org> 
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 16:31:19 +0000
Message-ID: <22335.826734679@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I will probably make another stab at convincing the gang that "phkmalloc"
> > should be put in 2.1, ...
> 
> I think it would be an extremely bad idea to re-release 2.1 for any
> reason. If you want to put the new malloc in an officially released 
> version before 2.2, then call it 2.1.1 or 2.1.phk or something, but 
> don't start rewriting history.

I didn't even think about rewriting 2.1.  I should probably have written
"-stable" instead...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.