From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 14:42:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01116A402; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCA913C46C; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547A9208F; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:42:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C469208D; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:42:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 053EFA1073; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:42:44 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Dejan Lesjak References: <46022E59.7030407@jabbe.de> <46026D62.4010009@FreeBSD.org> <861wj9sjz6.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200703281611.01544.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:42:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200703281611.01544.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> (Dejan Lesjak's message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:11:00 +0200") Message-ID: <86veglpgyk.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Florent Thoumie Subject: Re: What can I do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:42:53 -0000 Dejan Lesjak writes: > On Wednesday 28 of March 2007, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > I suspect you're way past the point where new issues show up faster > > than you can fix them. The only way out of this tar pit is to merge > > everything into the ports tree so other port maintainers have a real > > incentive to help you out. > Not quite just yet. We should at least fix trivial failures (mostly > plist fixes) that would otherwise keep things like qt and gtk from > building. Uh? I thought those had been taken care of a long time ago. I maintain(ed) a small Linux distro at work, and I completed the transition to modular X.org about a year and a half ago. I appreciate the difference in scale, but still, I'm starting to wonder if you guys still have all your marbles. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no