Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:15:56 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: BROKEN vs. IGNORE [was: cvs commit: ports/devel/whups Makefile] Message-ID: <405AC85C.1070001@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <200402180350.i1I3oZtv045855@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200402180350.i1I3oZtv045855@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > kris 2004/02/17 19:50:35 PST > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > devel/whups Makefile > Log: > Change BROKEN to IGNORE since the package still builds (but does not work) Are there any rules when to use BROKEN and when to use IGNORE? <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-March/010340.html>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405AC85C.1070001>