From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 11 16:38:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71DDACAFF4 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559A0C5D for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from host-4-75.office.adestra.com (vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 995AA86A3; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/995AA86A3; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: pkg: fetching binary packages to a local dumpdir for a different ABI To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160311104226.35a9e17d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <56E2973C.8070703@quip.cz> <56E2A8EF.8000705@freebsd.org> <56E2B43B.7080109@quip.cz> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <56E2F460.7080604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:37:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E2B43B.7080109@quip.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Mppqc5SlALp7LqX7noN4QMD8RQxmSq7r3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:38:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Mppqc5SlALp7LqX7noN4QMD8RQxmSq7r3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="F5FPNEeAT5wju0hFpE2j8tPhC0dwDTLAL" From: Matthew Seaman To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56E2F460.7080604@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: pkg: fetching binary packages to a local dumpdir for a different ABI References: <20160311104226.35a9e17d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <56E2973C.8070703@quip.cz> <56E2A8EF.8000705@freebsd.org> <56E2B43B.7080109@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <56E2B43B.7080109@quip.cz> --F5FPNEeAT5wju0hFpE2j8tPhC0dwDTLAL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/03/11 12:04, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote on 03/11/2016 12:15: >> On 03/11/16 10:00, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> O. Hartmann wrote on 03/11/2016 10:42: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> The ABI is also unclear. Some documents say it is freebsd:10:x86:64 >>>> (which >>>> looks more the Intel/Linux dominated terminology) and also this one = is >>>> considered correct: FreeBSD:10:amd64 (looks more FreeBSD'ish). It is= >>>> said that >>>> the variable ABI is derived from "sh" - how? >>> >>> It is freebsd:10:x86:64. You can look at http://pkg.freebsd.org/ >>> The full URL is http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/ >> >> Actually, ${ABI} *used* to be freebsd:10:x86:64. It changed to >> FreeBSD:10:amd64 quite some time and numerous releases of pkg(8) ago n= ow. >=20 > It's strange that it is not listed at mirror page > http://pkg.freebsd.org/ There are only old ABI formats. Yeah. But that page also mentions packages for 8.x which is now well out of support. I believe that the official package mirrors have been set up to work with both variants of the ABI string, and the page you reference simply hasn't been updated for a while. Cheers, Matthew --F5FPNEeAT5wju0hFpE2j8tPhC0dwDTLAL-- --Mppqc5SlALp7LqX7noN4QMD8RQxmSq7r3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJW4vRmXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnCfIP/0zzCiswt/NyHcvq1LoHu69B ZbWLbfOAnRfa9RV68batnHJazM6BNhFlLc4HwZdq14GPkksHjh/t4MUO/O1M5+yt ye0nMSeCu4Rahk3qAFqI7sWC0Fii/tEbSVjC94/j0P+pqoh26zmDeS3qv+fKEpSO AsXbS+W/Ekwvg/0fWaDlKfL2m6MyRThh8c4/Xq1eqiY+TNlhMnq2ysU58xpP1LV6 frPM6/4haowl6hHlBHnhGOS7X37UZs8SqPY/8ngW80m0biYWQaCnvfLjD9PFRUzA TwHTtUYqo96TWy90g0TePSeegOhQ37hfqlHLOhbfKcGOxWlwinAv3AQ7BPT4pqZx fw1FtZJpLuh1cwr7gofOtBRUquKMwEY0zZpEeOp96M4a7X1fCtXkHfP5rLCYnScn drOZ+Ji+Pi7q3Kx+XyRHg8SG/A+l3gjSo8KSuAPt+QM7clvbJrYlo1fvwYx9EDbB VnAtkZfOk8EjwFdVZU6HzcwJ2BNlBsF52ZxBOKBPMYN+9qQhuxSuF65Gf1zhaqsf u1gep7+lkLurQD2thaPVbHJx9TfXBQLlprfTYZEP4itlvD7cu1BwyfGAqkYZ32aX 9Q2YsMnoEgochxDW+LSOCKVz6FnpoRAKGqA4T0AP170POrm4R6tgT0ZpUfBa+Ayr d53kIbaBXHSFJk/M4CCv =tn7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Mppqc5SlALp7LqX7noN4QMD8RQxmSq7r3--