From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 20:09:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBB31065670 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C1F8FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3CK3Nfe081293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Warner Losh X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:15 -0600 Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <18A31C67-D0B5-4E28-AA50-241F60EBFB83@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:03:25 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:09:30 -0000 On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Warner. > You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., = 18:32:24: >=20 >=20 >> I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been = merged to head. > It seems, every NanoBSD-based project (FreeNAS, BSDRP, maybe other) > has "home-brew" patches to nanobsd.sh and some support scripts, which, > IMHO, worth to evaluate and, may be, integrate to "official" NanoBSD. I have a queue of patches to try to integrate back into main FreeBSD = from these projects already. I just need a little bit of time to do = that. > Also, here is attempt to re-write NanoBSD in more clean and modular > way (to be honest, nanobsd.sh code is not an example of clean & good = shell > code, compare to rc.d infrastructure, for example): >=20 > http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/NanoBSD_NG I saw that. We'll see where it goes. Not sure I entirely share your = views on cleanliness. To be honest, though, this sort of thing would really be better written = in python, since that language is much more expressive and easier to use = in many ways than shell. > P.S. I get these messages with my AND list addresses in To/CC: only > once, as "personal" ones, is it Ok? I just removed all the cc's except embedded. Warner > --=20 > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov >=20 >=20 >=20