From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jul 28 23:16: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4E637BB40 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:16:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6244D1C6B; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:16:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:16:03 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Nate Williams Cc: Matt Heckaman , FreeBSD-ISP Subject: Re: FTP Servers Message-ID: <20000729021603.J5021@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200007290440.WAA25453@nomad.yogotech.com> <200007290453.WAA25511@nomad.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200007290453.WAA25511@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:53:29PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:53:29PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > > Well, that's unfair. That bug hit virtually every ftpd around. I would not > > hold it against proftpd. > > It didn't hit FreeBSD's stock ftpd. FreeBSD's stock ftpd doesn't do anything near as much as proftpd. > > Think about it for a moment, in my eyes, this bug does not > > detract at all from proftpd's solid performance. Nobody is perfect. > > The same thing could be said about wu-ftpd, which has logged more miles > than *any* other freeware ftp server. That it's worked for years > doesn't mean it is seucre. That it's worked for years is a miracle of modern computing. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message