From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 11:46:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413101065695 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from mail.giulioferro.it (mail.giulioferro.it [85.18.102.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFCD8FC0C for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:46:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A4E33C8E; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at giulioferro.it Received: from mail.giulioferro.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aurynwork1sv1.giulioferro.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4sK2yINySlh; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from aurynmob2.giulioferro.it (mail.zirakzigil.org [82.63.178.63]) (Authenticated sender: gferro@giulioferro.it) by mail.giulioferro.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8848C33C18; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:47:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49688A88.4080503@zirakzigil.org> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:46:16 +0100 From: Giulio Ferro User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan References: <49685F15.7080605@zirakzigil.org> <20090110100357.GB2718@zeninc.net> In-Reply-To: <20090110100357.GB2718@zeninc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATT patch on current X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:46:23 -0000 VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:40:53AM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote: > >> I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19 >> fails to apply cleanly. >> The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870 >> >> Any news for the natt integration in CURRENT? >> > > Thanks for the report. > I'm currently working on cleaning the PFKey part of the patch > (available on Perforce if you're interested, and I hope our tests to > be ok in a few days, so I'll send kernel+userland patch for public > test/review), so I don't use anymore the public version of the patch > for TRUNK. > > I'll be mostly AFK for the next 2-3 days, but I'll try to find quickly > some time to update the public patch soon. > > Thanks, looking forward to it... :-)