From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 29 17:33:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978E4106566C for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:33:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AB88FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:33:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,267,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="295239720" Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2009 17:04:43 +0000 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n3TH4hKv000945; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:04:43 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3TH4Xmh004921; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:04:43 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:04:42 -0400 Received: from 161.44.65.27 ([161.44.65.27]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:04:42 +0000 Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com by email.cisco.com; 29 Apr 2009 13:04:50 -0400 From: Brian McGovern To: Craig Butler In-Reply-To: <1241024317.3270.60.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> References: <200904272058.18266.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> <1240912547.3270.5.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> <200904290754.59920.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> <1241024317.3270.60.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc. Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:04:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1241024690.98833.26.camel@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2009 17:04:42.0522 (UTC) FILETIME=[96D617A0:01C9C8EC] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=412; t=1241024683; x=1241888683; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=bmcgover@cisco.com; z=From:=20Brian=20McGovern=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Installing=20from=20cdrom=20not=20worki ng |Sender:=20; bh=lrTDlPtv7kkj3pDdUSULeW8YXI92TP9A5qfdbt26OPA=; b=P+0QOh0v6nAyMkRNfq58OG5zv8jZBp/uzuifpuNzNrlNlBvWLxgLPmc5gK JYLKTUiZXO/To1128nEPAv6goofccBLugiq+AGZywa01r+GCokQwJwFbWuIL zPoTu20xCg; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=bmcgover@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing from cdrom not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bmcgover@cisco.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:33:07 -0000 > > is ok that i used a CD-RW instead of a CD+RW, CD-R or CD+R? > Its worth a try of a normal cdr. My V100s and V120s hate CD-RWs. I've also found its often worth while recording at slower speeds than allowed. The speed/power levels on many drives are goofy, and often an alternative speed gives better performance on wonky drives. I see the same problem/solution with DVDs on various players. -B