Date: Sun, 05 Apr 1998 17:51:11 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more SMP stuff Message-ID: <199804050951.RAA08764@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Apr 1998 19:03:15 %2B1000." <199804050903.TAA30092@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > I wrote: > >nanosleep() is currently quite broken: > >- EWOULDBLOCK is returned instead of 0 in most cases when the timeout > > expires. > > Fixed by Peter. > > >- EWOULDBLOCK is returned instead of EINTR if an interrupt occurs and > > syscalls are not being restarted after this interrupt. > > Actually, nanosleep() doesn't return in this case. I was using your diff to nanosleep, but a 1 second sleep started taking 724 seconds.... Perhaps it was the nanotime() twiddle I was trying.. > Bruce > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804050951.RAA08764>