From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 12 12:50:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA28298 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:50:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA28288 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:50:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.4) with UUCP id UAA05833; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 20:49:20 GMT Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 20:45:37 GMT X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199801120007.TAA00316@dyson.iquest.net> References: <34b95e60.140553@mail.cetlink.net> from John Kelly at "Jan 12, 98 00:09:22 am" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 20:45:58 +0000 To: "John S. Dyson" From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk At 12:07 am +0000 12/1/98, John S. Dyson wrote: >I have a 16650 based card, and it appears to work well. It would be >interesting >to figure out why mine works, and others don't. Most 16[56]50s out there are broken, period. I find it amazing that semiconductor manufacturers can't seem to get UARTs right. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK