From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Sep  7 10: 8:59 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 583)
	id C55F114D31; Tue,  7 Sep 1999 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: dufault@hda.com, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@scc.nl
In-Reply-To: <199909061518.LAA03161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <19990907170857.C55F114D31@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue,  7 Sep 1999 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: bde@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce Evans)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> This is a particularly safe implementation typedef,
> since I don't anticipate uint64_t ever being used in a future specification
> as a different data type.

> I don't know about ANSI.

It's in C9x.

But not in <signal.h>.  The n869 draft has it in <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h>
only.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message