From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov 13 06:05:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA18228
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 06:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA18223
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 06:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.2/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id OAA14989; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 14:05:25 GMT
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:05:25 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net>
cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Programming technique for non-forking servers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961113122121.8648B-100000@creator.gu.kiev.ua>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961113230137.14783D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[cc:Trimmed]

Is forking on FreeBSD all that bad?

On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Andrew Stesin wrote:

> I mean those like Squid, Harvest cached, probably Gated
> (there is also a non-forking WWW server somewhere, but
> I forgot it's name, for a pity).

Roxen, previously Spinner.

Regards,


Mike Hancock