From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 22 09:07:59 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB73516A481;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129AD13C4CC;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 762C58C0EC; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:11:23 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:11:23 -0600
To: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>
Message-ID: <20071122081123.GA23167@soaustin.net>
References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu>
	<20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com>
	<200711210759.56913.linimon@FreeBSD.org>
	<20071122.085431.129774588.chat95@mac.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071122.085431.129774588.chat95@mac.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: stephen@math.missouri.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org,
	portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:08:00 -0000

> IMHO, octave-forge should be merged into octave itself,
> and relese version of octave and corrsponding octave-forge is old.
> I think this is a temporal situation. Once octave will be updated
> octave-forge will also be updated, and I believe octave-forge
> will be built with gcc42.

OK, in that case, approved.

mcl