From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Feb 22 19:01:36 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA15715 for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:01:36 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA15708; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:01:31 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.mt.net>
cc: current@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: TRUE and FALSE 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Feb 95 18:36:56 MST."
             <199502230136.SAA16736@trout.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:01:30 -0800
Message-ID: <15707.793508490@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Get off of it.  This always comes up, and all it does is ruffle
> feathers. You don't have to be release engineer to understand some of
> the issues required to do it.  Heck, all of us do (our at least should

Some of the issues, perhaps.  Significant grasp of enough of them to
argue this with me?  No.  Sorry, but no.  You can change my mind by
doing one thing and one thing ONLY, and that is to do a release or
even a snapshot of your own and then come back to me with a
description of what you did and how you did it.  Otherwise I simply am
not going to debate this any further with you.  You don't have the
qualifications, just as I lack the qualifications to debate the
intricacies of the VM system with David and John or the internals of
the network code with Garrett.  I know my limitations.  And I know
your limitations.  This argument is over.  You want to argue it
further?  Do the work first then come back, otherwise don't waste my
time.

					Jordan