From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 10:21:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075CE3B9; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C19381E7F; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cpc14-cmbg15-2-0-cust307.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.26.1.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3AAL2JO014582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:21:04 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r350792 - head/emulators/tme From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20140410101619.GD8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:20:56 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <65A56C9B-D8B0-4940-888F-DB1EE6CD1544@FreeBSD.org> References: <201404100911.s3A9B8BV042081@svn.freebsd.org> <20140410094640.GB8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140410121133.000066f7@freebsd.org> <20140410101619.GD8207@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, =?utf-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_P=C4=99kala?= X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:21:08 -0000 On 10 Apr 2014, at 11:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > The day gtk20 does not depends anymore on this you are doomed if those = deps are > explicitly depended on by your port It depends on whether these are real direct dependencies or not. If = they were bugs in the original (i.e. it only depended on X because it = depended on Y and Y needs X) then removing them was the right thing to = do. If they are real direct dependencies (i.e. it needs Y independent = of X, but X happens to depend on Y) then they should be explicit. David