From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 16:09:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF35710656B5 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15F98FC25 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KAobx-00036R-SM for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:09:45 -0700 Message-ID: <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:09:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Kage To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jirokagey@hotmail.com References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> Subject: Re: gem0 frame error X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:09:47 -0000 Marius Strobl wrote: > > > With what version of FreeBSD is this? > > Marius > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn about systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good switch fixed the problem completely. At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! (It is 7.0-release, by the way) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/gem0-frame-error-tp18034453p18072527.html Sent from the freebsd-sparc64 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.