From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 3 12:33:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845AB37B5BA for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AE3DDF8; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 21:32:25 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <38E8E960.2C5A8FD5@cvzoom.net> References: <200004030410.XAA75906@celery.dragondata.com> <38E8DEEF.7224C9A@geocities.com> <38E8E960.2C5A8FD5@cvzoom.net> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 21:28:05 +0200 To: Donn Miller From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Load average calculation? Cc: Barry Pederson , current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:56 PM -0400 2000/4/3, Donn Miller wrote: > For example, FreeBSD, > Linux, Solaris, SCO, etc. may all be running the exact same processes, > but will the load avg. always be consistent across those platforms? I > think not. That's not a problem. Other OSes really aren't our problem, and you would expect to have different configuration files on them anyway. What *may* be a potential problem is if we change the way we calculate load average on our own OS -- that we *are* responsible for. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message