From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 14 16:50:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA32C135; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D348266B; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C7ABDC25; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2FC2BDC1D; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1DF60E8; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31B361A24CE; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:50:13 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Baptiste Daroussin , perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: With or without .packlist? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:50:16 -0000 +--On 10 octobre 2013 08:10:45 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: | Hi guys, |=20 | With the staging support, we can properly decide what we do pack or not | inside the packages, the question now is do we keep the .packlist (in | that case they need to be fixed because they are full of stage path :)) | or should we just drop those files and no package them at all. |=20 | It seems to me that most of the other operating systems are not = packaging. |=20 | I have no clue what what those .packlist files are useful for, so I do | have no opinion, would be nice to get a perl@ claim on this soon, as we | either need to fix them or nuke them. |=20 | btw: sunpoet has a PR I'm sitting one because of that: | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/182806 Well, like I said in the PR history, I'm with Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric for = dropping them. In the mean time, you could do the exp-run, and see if something new breaks so that we can fix that :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold