From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 02:05:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48C16A400; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E51413C44B; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A6256.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.98.86]) (authenticated bits=128) by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5M1P2tl095595; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:25:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5M1Ou0o004126; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:24:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5M1Otob089313; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:24:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <200706220124.l5M1Otob089313@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Jeremy Chadwick In-reply-to: <868xadj651.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <4676BAF0.4030703@gmail.com> <20070618180813.GA13003@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <322073cc0706181415o17ecd532i971d8bdf5ea1dafd@mail.gmail.com> <20070618221022.GA17952@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <868xadj651.fsf@dwp.des.no> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= message dated "Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:26:50 +0200." Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:24:55 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Martin Turgeon Subject: Re: i386 with PAE or AMD64 on PowerEdge with 4G RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:05:35 -0000 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick writes: > > Like I said, I don't run 64-bit OSes because I prefer compatibility. > > Believe me, the instant you run into some quirky problem with either the > > kernel or any of its subsystems, or a third-party program (from ports or > > otherwise), the first thing you'll be told is "it works for me on i386, > > have you tried i386?" > > Absolute nonsense. FreeBSD is just as solid on amd64 as on i386, and A while back I reverted my AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ (2010.06-MHz 686-class CPU) from 64 to 32 bit, 'cos of bad ports. ls /var/db/pkg | wc -l # 536 Not that I use them all, they just accumulate. FreeBSD is as solid as damp cement on many old laptops ( http://berklix.org/~jhs/hardware/laptops/ ) ie doesn't install beyond 4.11. No time for ports pain as well as base install failures. -- Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com HTML mail unseen. Ihr Rauch=mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Dump cigs 4 snuff.