From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 18 01:33:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A87106568B; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AD58FC3F; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so208715ewy.43 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kyWkZFIE/YPqQdFvSfdr1sxfhxa9ExTRob0bzwI1grU=; b=CIPAnj0Cfjd/YH25RPOg51vDZjxvbgHXTG9NxmOpg5M0uQaZjPdrY0hfZtaDBn0bFc np3UmZ4TBzQflA4lMCltt9Rnk/rSQdXz1OElT8I01Baaj4aPFuhfSOg/bmu9Bvg28aeb 3yvNV4P0YKTEZRyAiqOp0ZYZnA+MQR+MZdo2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hb8rOnRIOoqXT3h4dOEeyNoiyHCLbUqZFJomlCEJquxNktFqTo1oeNsCGKwmh8Mnj3 zRw/zu+YAQnp3rvEhl/kbFSEjr7ubKYB16Xm4Ml0nzqnRr87dn5pf+tr2xE/uVWOzjzc dSK1epbeT6or4fymugu8ziOch7Df1GHKrTUbM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.63.16 with SMTP id l16mr210478eba.27.1250557602739; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:06:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200908171658.n7HGwqc3041735@casselton.net> References: <20090817135752.GA73485@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <200908171658.n7HGwqc3041735@casselton.net> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: Mark Tinguely Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports lang/gcc4x fail to build on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:33:40 -0000 That error is gcc oh-so-helpfully telling you that it decided not to inline an function declared inline. Why the gcc devs decided that was deserving of a diagnostic on -Wall is beyond me. I think that you can squelch it by passing -Wno-inline to gcc.