Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:29:48 -0500 From: "Howard Leadmon" <howard@leadmon.net> To: "'Matthew Seaman'" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Message-ID: <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> In-Reply-To: <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > > On 11/14/13 07:29, Howard Leadmon wrote: > > OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the rest, > > time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am just > > building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibility > > libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or I am > > missing something in the process. > > It seems you have build tools like cmake that link against 9.x > libraries. Ideally you should rebuild your build tools before you > rebuild the things use them to build. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > What is needed to rebuild the tools? Maybe I missed that someplace, and could use a quick hit with a cloo bat. I did another complete build of world, installed everything, even make sure pkg was seeing my ports, and then proceeded to rebuild subversion on the machine out of ports. Sure enough, when it was rebuilt and installed, I see it's still using the 9.x libs, and I would have thought it would have moved to using the 10.x libs, so I must be missing something on this side.. --- Howard Leadmon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$>