Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:02:39 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bapt@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deprecation: round3 Message-ID: <4e390eaf.5MJ3G9ielo7JZhvs%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <6483ddd2504ceeb023f1e4774b495f72@etoilebsd.net> References: <6483ddd2504ceeb023f1e4774b495f72@etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > For the third time, I'm running a deprecation campaign to > remove old, unmaintain and/or problematic stuff from the > ports tree (ports@) > > As usual I may be wrong there maybe some false positive, > I sharpened a bit my analysis scripts so there should be > less false positive in the deprecated ports. > > While here I have fix and will fix lots of ports master_sites that > would be great if you fix as much master sites as you can, this > website may help: http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/ What, exactly, is the significance of the list at http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/ports@FreeBSD.org-bad.html beyond that the ports listed there are unmaintained? "make fetch" succeeded for every one of the ~150 ports that I tried from that list, using the first site it attempted in the considerable majority of cases.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e390eaf.5MJ3G9ielo7JZhvs%perryh>