From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 7 10:41:36 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA26332 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 May 1995 10:41:36 -0700 Received: from remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp [131.113.82.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA26326 for ; Sun, 7 May 1995 10:41:34 -0700 Received: (from hosokawa@localhost) by remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.4Wbeta3) id CAA03062; Mon, 8 May 1995 02:41:27 +0900 Date: Mon, 8 May 1995 02:41:27 +0900 Message-Id: <199505071741.CAA03062@remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp> To: phk@ref.tfs.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: Bug of if_ze is serious! (Re: Help! if_ze bug?) In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 7 May 1995 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT). <199505071608.JAA10106@ref.tfs.com> From: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.18PL3] 1994-08/01(Mon) Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <199505071608.JAA10106@ref.tfs.com> phk@ref.tfs.com writes: >> I'm running just fine... My card comes to work fine now. But I can't explain why it works. When I configured the ze with device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd0000 flags 0x10 vector zeintr the sending packet corrupts, but configured it device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd4000 flags 0x10 vector zeintr it works fine... Hmm.... The former ioaddr is default value. Why it does not work on the former configuration? -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi E-mail: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp WWW homepage: http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa.html Department of Computer Science, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan