From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 4 06:56:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA11939 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 06:56:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.scsn.net (scsn.net [206.25.246.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA11928 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 06:56:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmaddox@scsn.net) Received: from rhiannon.scsn.net ([209.12.57.60]) by mail.scsn.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-41950U6000L1100S0) with ESMTP id AAA144 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 09:46:57 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by rhiannon.scsn.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA01054 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 4 Oct 1998 09:56:26 GMT (envelope-from root) Message-ID: <19981004095625.A879@scsn.net> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 09:56:25 +0000 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? Reply-To: dmaddox@scsn.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While trying to build the new boot loader, it kept failing because stand.h was not found. To make a long story short, I had previously done a 'make -DCLOBBER includes' in the (apparently mistaken) belief that this was the canonically-accepted way of making sure that I had a clean, up-to-date, and _complete_ set of includes in /usr/include. It appears that /usr/include/stand.h only gets installed when libstand is installed. Shouldn't a 'make -DCLOBBER includes' result in a _complete_ set of includes? Are there other includes than stand.h that don't get installed by 'make includes'? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message