From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jul 8 10:40:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA02500 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:40:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02495 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id KAA13137; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199807081740.KAA13137@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: Bill Fenner Subject: Re: misc/7214: named-xfer dies (silently) when attempting to transfer files with particular CNAME records Reply-To: Bill Fenner Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/7214; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bill Fenner To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, sysadmin@greeves.mfn.org Cc: Subject: Re: misc/7214: named-xfer dies (silently) when attempting to transfer files with particular CNAME records Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:37:43 PDT >perfectly rfc-legal Not quite. RFC 1034 says: If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other data should be present and since you have SOA and NS records for mfn.org, you may not have a CNAME for it. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message